Standards and Financial Statements

Considering IAS 20 Standard: Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance

Illustration for Considering IAS 20 Standard: Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance
Skip to content
Standards and Financial Statements Keyword: IAS 20 Government Grants

Considering IAS 20 Standard: Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance

IAS 20 sets the framework to prevent “window dressing” financial results when receiving government support. When should you recognize the grant? How is it presented in the Financial Statements? And what must be disclosed so the support doesn’t become an ambiguous figure? In this article, you will understand the rules of recognition, measurement, and presentation, complete with practical journal entry examples and a calculator for fixed asset grants.

Illustration for Considering IAS 20 Standard: Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance
A grant is not “free revenue”; IAS 20 links it to conditions and the periods in which the entity benefits.
What will you gain from this article?
  • Clear distinction between Government Grant and Government Assistance.
  • Recognition criteria (Reasonable Assurance) and how to prevent premature recording.
  • Common presentation methods: Deduction from asset cost vs. Deferred Income (and the impact of each).
  • A practical disclosure checklist to minimize audit risks.
  • Interactive calculator to schedule the impact of a fixed asset grant on depreciation and/or deferred income.
Foundational links before diving in: Financial Accounting Basics + IFRS vs IAS (These will help you understand the philosophy of presentation and disclosure before entering IAS 20).

1) Why is IAS 20 Important?

Government grants may improve liquidity and support investment, but the accounting risk arises when the grant turns into “immediate revenue” without being linked to conditions or the beneficiary period. Here, IAS 20 ensures two things:

  • Matching: Recognizing the grant in the same periods as the related expenses/costs.
  • Transparency: Disclosing the nature of the support, its conditions, and any future obligations or repayment risks.
Golden Rule: If the support is “conditional,” accounting must show the condition… not hide it within a lump sum figure.

2) Definitions and Scope: Grant vs. Assistance

IAS 20 distinguishes between:

Quick Definitions (To avoid confusion)
Term Practical Meaning Examples
Government Grant Transfer of resources to the entity in return for past or future compliance with certain conditions related to operating activities. Grant for purchasing equipment, wage subsidies linked to retaining employment.
Government Assistance Action by government designed to provide an economic benefit specific to an entity or range of entities qualifying under certain criteria. Provision of infrastructure, free technical advice, public services where value is hard to separate.
Non-monetary Grant A grant in the form of an asset/land/equipment instead of cash. Granting industrial land, training equipment.
Scope Note: Some forms of “support” may relate to other standards (like income taxes under Tax Accounting) or require financing treatment if involving loans (like subsidized loans), so do not treat IAS 20 in isolation.

3) Recognition Criteria: “Reasonable Assurance”

A grant is not recognized simply because a “letter exists” or management “expects it.” IAS 20 requires Reasonable Assurance that:

  • The entity will comply with the conditions attaching to them.
  • The grant will be received (receipt/entitlement/collectability).
How to determine “Reasonable Assurance” practically?
  • Are the conditions verifiable? (Number of employees, localization ratios, specific CAPEX spending…)
  • Is there a history of disbursement? Are there cases of retraction in the sector?
  • Has final approval been granted or is it just an application?
  • Is there sufficient supporting documentation for the audit file?
Important Link to IAS 8: Any change in presentation policy or correction of prior errors must be disciplined. (See: Accounting Guidance).

4) Measurement: Fair Value, Non-Monetary & Subsidized Loans

General Rule: Government grants are measured at the fair value of the asset received (or receivable). However, complexities arise in three common cases:

4.1 Non-monetary Grants (Land/Equipment)

May be presented at fair value or at a nominal amount depending on the adopted policy, provided there is clear disclosure. In both cases, the goal is for the “grant effect” to appear on the statements understandably.

4.2 Grants related to Assets

When linked to an asset, the grant appears over time, matching the consumption (depreciation) of the asset under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment.

Recommended for you

FS Draft Workbook - Excel File

Electronic Draft Financial Statements is an Excel tool designed to create dynamic financial statemen...

Recommended for you

Fixed Assets Depreciation Model - Excel File

Fixed Assets Depreciation & Management Template is a comprehensive Excel program to manage fixed...

4.3 Government Loans at Below-Market Interest Rates

The “difference” between the market interest rate and the subsidized loan rate is often treated as a grant element. Accounting separates the financing element (measured under Financial Instruments standards) from the grant element (under IAS 20) with disclosure.

Practical Alert for Accountants: Do not confuse a “grant” with a “loan”; a loan is a liability to be repaid, whereas a grant is recorded subject to conditions, and its impact appears on income over specific periods.

5) Asset Grants: Deferred Income or Net Method?

Asset grants (e.g., a grant to buy machinery) have two common presentation methods, both acceptable if applied consistently and disclosed:

Asset Grants: Two Presentation Methods (Economic result is usually the same)
Method Concept Impact on Statements
Net Method
Deduct grant from asset cost
Record the asset at net cost after deducting the grant. Lower annual depreciation — No separate “grant revenue” appears.
Deferred Income
Gross Method
Record the grant as a liability/deferred income, then recognize in P&L over time. Full asset depreciation + Periodic grant income roughly equal to the discount effect.

5.1 Quick Example (Journal Entries)

Assume: Machine cost 1,000,000, Grant 200,000, Useful life 5 years (Straight line).

A) Net Method (Deduction from Cost)
  • Record asset at net 800,000 → Annual Depreciation = 160,000
  • P&L Impact: Lower depreciation expense (no visible grant revenue).

B) Deferred Income Method
  • Record asset 1,000,000 + Deferred Income 200,000
  • Annual Depreciation = 200,000
  • Annual Grant Income = 40,000
  • Net P&L Impact ≈ 160,000 (Expense)
Choosing a method is not just “cosmetic” — inconsistency or changing methods without justification and disclosure may trigger audit remarks.

6) Income Grants: Other Income or Deduction?

Income grants (like wage subsidies or training reimbursement) are typically presented in one of two ways:

  • As Other Income: Support appears as a separate line item, easy to track.
  • Deduction from related expense: Such as deducting wage subsidies from the salaries line item.
When is “Other Income” preferred? When management and auditors want to easily track support programs, especially with multiple conditions and government reports.

6.1 Example: Wage Subsidy linked to Retention

If the entity meets the “employee retention” condition during the period, the grant can be recognized in the same period the salary expense was incurred. (For employee benefits detail, see: IAS 19 Employee Benefits).

Disclosure Hint: If the support is linked to a time condition (e.g., maintaining headcount until a specific date), state the condition clearly in the notes.

7) Repayment and Breach of Conditions

The most critical control point in IAS 20 is: What if the entity breaches conditions and must repay the grant? Treatment depends on the type:

Repayment Rules by Type
Grant Type Treatment upon Repayment Potential Immediate Impact
Income Grant Repayment is recognized as an expense in the period (or increase in related expense) to the extent no deferred credit exists. Direct hit to profit.
Asset Grant (Deferred Income) Deducted first from the deferred income balance; any excess is an expense. Immediate expense if deferred balance is insufficient.
Asset Grant (Net Method) Repayment amount increases the asset’s carrying value; future depreciation is recalculated. Increased future depreciation instead of immediate expense (usually).
Link to IAS 8: Grant repayment is often treated as a change in estimate/subsequent event, not a “prior period error” unless the initial recognition lacked reasonable assurance. Documenting the “Reasonable Assurance” decision from the start protects you.

8) Disclosure: Practical Checklist to Reduce Audit Risk

IAS 20 emphasizes disclosure because grants may carry future obligations or operational restrictions. Use this checklist as a minimum:

Disclosure Checklist (Concise & Actionable):
  • Accounting Policy: Presentation method (Net or Deferred) + basis of recognition and measurement.
  • Nature and Extent: Support program/Agency/Type of grant and its value.
  • Unfulfilled Conditions: Any outstanding conditions or contingencies.
  • Repayment Risks: If any exist, with a brief description.
  • Impact on Line Items: Where did the support appear? (Other income/Expense deduction/Deferred income…)
Don’t forget Cash Flows: Receipt of the grant affects cash flow presentation depending on its nature. (See: Financial Accounting Basics).
Complementary Links:

9) IAS 20 Calculator: Asset Grant Schedule

Enter the asset cost, grant value, and useful life, then choose the presentation method. You will get the Annual Depreciation and/or Periodic Grant Income and a summary schedule.

Annual Depreciation Exp.
Annual Grant Income
Net P&L Impact (Annual)
Simplified Schedule: Depreciation / Grant Income / Balances
Year Depreciation Grant Income Net P&L Impact Carrying Amount (Year End) Deferred Income (Year End)
Note: This calculator assumes Straight-Line depreciation and zero salvage value for simplicity. In reality, IAS 16 factors (salvage value/life review) may affect the schedule.

10) Frequently Asked Questions

Can I recognize a grant as soon as I apply for the program?

Generally, no. Recognition requires “Reasonable Assurance” of compliance and receipt, not just probability or intent.

Is the Net Method better than Deferred Income?

There is no absolute “better.” Consistency and disclosure are key. Deferred Income makes the grant impact visible as separate information, while Net Method simplifies presentation by reducing depreciation.

How do I handle repayment if I breach conditions?

It depends on the type and method: It may be deducted from Deferred Income (if any) or added to the Asset value (Net Method), or recognized as an immediate expense for income grants.

Does tax relief fall under IAS 20?

Usually, treatments related to income tax are discussed under Tax Accounting (IAS 12), so check the nature of support first.

11) Conclusion and Action Plan

IAS 20 Government Grants is not just an “entry”; it’s a control system. It ensures support is presented transparently and logically linked to related expenses/assets, disclosing conditions that might turn into liabilities.

6-Step Action Plan:
  1. Identify Type: Asset grant, income grant, or subsidized loan?
  2. Assess Assurance: Documents + Conditions + Collectability.
  3. Select Method: Net or Deferred (Document justification and apply consistently).
  4. Match Period: Align recognition with related depreciation/expense periods.
  5. Prepare Disclosure: Policy + Nature/Extent + Conditions + Repayment risks.
  6. Test Repayment Scenario: What happens if conditions are breached? (Before it actually happens).

© Digital Salla Articles — General educational content. Application of IAS 20 may be affected by specific contract details, local regulations, and audit requirements. Consult a specialist for material financial/contractual/disclosure decisions.