Standards and Financial Statements

Difference Between IAS and IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards and International Accounting Standards

Illustration for Difference Between IAS and IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards and International Accounting Standards
Skip to content
Standards & Financial Statements Main keyword: IFRS vs IAS

Difference Between IFRS and IAS: International Financial Reporting Standards vs International Accounting Standards

Understanding the difference between IFRS and IAS helps you read financial statements more accurately, avoid “mixing versions,” and spot what changes in measurement and disclosures. In this guide you’ll get the practical answer to “what’s the real difference?”—and how to reflect it in reporting and analysis alongside topics like Financial Accounting (core principles) and Advanced Techniques in Financial Statement Validation.

Illustration for Difference Between IAS and IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards and International Accounting Standards
Two very similar terms—yet with different history and naming. Knowing the difference helps you avoid relying on a standard that has been replaced.
Quick snapshot before we start
  • IAS: older standards issued before the current IASB era (historically via IASC). Many IAS standards are still effective today.
  • IFRS: newer standards issued by the IASB; some have replaced older IAS standards.
  • When a company says “we apply IFRS,” it typically means the full set: IFRS + still-effective IAS + interpretations (IFRIC/SIC).
Want a short background on how accounting “frameworks” evolved over time? Start with The Origin and Evolution of Accounting, and for a broader lens on what influences the numbers, see Impacts of Various Factors on Financial Statements.

1) IAS and IFRS in one minute

IAS stands for International Accounting Standards. Historically, these standards came before the newer “IFRS” naming, and several IAS standards remain foundational in reporting today.

IFRS stands for International Financial Reporting Standards. These are the standards issued by the IASB in the modern era—covering newer areas and, in some cases, replacing older IAS standards with updated measurement and disclosure requirements.

Smart way to think about it: Don’t treat IFRS and IAS as two separate frameworks—think of them as generations within one system.

2) The real difference: name, history, and issuer

In practice, the difference between the two terms can be summarized in three points:

  • Naming: IAS is the older naming; IFRS is the newer naming for standards issued later.
  • Issuer: IAS is associated with the earlier stage; IFRS are issued by the IASB.
  • Status: some IAS have been replaced by IFRS, while many IAS remain effective and widely applied.
What matters for accountants: When writing policies or reading disclosures, avoid vague statements like “we apply IAS” alone. A professional phrasing is typically: “The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.” For the “why now?” angle on evolving requirements, see Impact of Regulatory Changes on Financial Statements.

3) Did IAS “end”? What “applying IFRS” means in practice

No—IAS did not end. Many IAS standards are still active and have been amended over time. Others were replaced when IFRS introduced newer or broader approaches to measurement, presentation, and disclosure.

When a company says “we apply IFRS,” it typically means:
  • Applying all effective standards in the IFRS ecosystem (whether named IAS or IFRS).
  • Considering interpretations (IFRIC / SIC) where applicable.
  • Presenting and explaining accounting policies in a way that supports clarity and comparability (practically: “users can follow the story”).
Practical note: Seeing “IAS/IFRS” together in reports is normal—it reflects that the ecosystem includes both.

4) Examples: IAS standards replaced by IFRS

The goal here isn’t memorizing numbers—it’s understanding that relying on an older standard without checking updates can lead to incorrect application or weak disclosures.

Recommended for you

Consolidated FS Template - Excel File

Consolidated Financial Statements Template is an advanced Excel tool to prepare consolidated financi...

Common examples (for awareness, not an exhaustive list)
Topic Older standard (IAS) Newer standard (IFRS) What changed (in one line)
Leases IAS 17 IFRS 16 Major change for lessees (right-of-use asset + lease liability instead of a pure operating/finance split).
Financial instruments IAS 39 IFRS 9 New classification/measurement + expected credit loss (ECL) model.
Revenue IAS 18 / IAS 11 IFRS 15 A unified 5-step revenue model with expanded disclosure requirements.
Operating segments IAS 14 IFRS 8 Management approach for identifying segments and disclosures.
If leases are relevant to your work, this internal reference can help you anchor the topic: Presentation of IAS 17 Standard (Leases).

5) Where standards show up in statements and notes

You’ll typically see IFRS/IAS effects in three places:

  1. Basis of preparation: usually early in the notes (“what framework are we using?”).
  2. Summary of significant accounting policies: what you recognize, how you measure, and key judgments.
  3. Line-item notes for material areas: especially items driven by estimates (tax, provisions, financial instruments, FX).
Fast review approach: Start with “high-judgment” areas. For example, FX-sensitive businesses often need strong disclosures and consistent treatment under: Exploring IAS 21 (Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates). For tax-driven measurement and disclosures, use: Tax Accounting.
Practical reading tip: If you see “a new standard was applied” or “a policy changed,” focus on: was the impact prospective only or did it change comparatives (restatement)? And was the impact explained quantitatively where possible?

6) Build consistent accounting policies and avoid errors

Correct application starts with written policies, then procedures (process), then documented professional judgment (a short memo). The key is consistency: the same transaction should be treated the same way every period, unless a justified change occurs.

A short template for a strong policy (copy/paste structure)
  • What is the item and scope?
  • When do we recognize it? (Recognition)
  • How do we measure it? (Measurement)
  • What are the key judgments and estimates—and why?
  • What disclosures are required and where do we present them?

If you want a practical starting point for building a clean internal policy library, see: Accounting Guidance for Financial Transactions.

Policies become much easier to enforce when the workflow is supported by systems and evidence trails. Useful next reads: Accounting Information Systems: How Technology Improves Accounting.

7) Common IFRS vs IAS misunderstandings (and fast fixes)

  • Mistake 1: Thinking IAS is a different framework than IFRS.
    Fix: treat IFRS as the umbrella that includes effective IAS + newer IFRS + interpretations.
  • Mistake 2: Using an older standard that has been replaced.
    Fix: confirm the currently effective guidance in your policy set and keep a change log.
  • Mistake 3: Saying “IFRS applied” without a clear basis-of-preparation statement.
    Fix: use consistent professional wording and keep it aligned with your reporting policy pack.
  • Mistake 4: Ignoring interpretations (IFRIC/SIC) when you hit a practical edge case.
    Fix: when the main standard doesn’t resolve the scenario cleanly, check relevant interpretations.
  • Mistake 5: Correct measurement but weak disclosures.
    Fix: strengthen disclosure quality and consistency—especially around judgment-heavy areas.
Quick review rule: Items that “move with time” (interest, discounting, tax, FX) often require clearer assumptions and sensitivity explanations.

8) Quick tool: IFRS compliance readiness index

This tool helps you take a fast pulse check before closing or audit season: updated policies + team enablement + open issues = a practical (not perfect) readiness snapshot.

Policy update rate
Approx. readiness score
Quick recommendation
Improve the score fast: start with the highest-impact topics, lock key disclosures, and make sure every change is documented and reviewable.

9) FAQs

Can I write “we apply IAS” only?

It’s more professional (and clearer) to reference IFRS as the umbrella, since the IFRS ecosystem includes effective IAS. Precision here reduces ambiguity for users and auditors.

Does every IAS standard have an IFRS replacement?

No. Many IAS standards remain effective and have not been replaced. Replacement happens when a newer IFRS standard is issued that covers the same topic with updated measurement or expanded disclosures.

Where do I find which standards were applied in a set of statements?

Typically in the “basis of preparation” and the “significant accounting policies” section within the notes. Then validate the key judgment-heavy areas (tax, FX, financial instruments, leases).

Does the IFRS vs IAS difference affect financial analysis?

Yes. Changes can alter measurement, presentation, and disclosure—which affects comparability across companies and periods. Always read policies and key notes before relying on ratios alone.

10) Summary + an execution checklist

The difference between IFRS and IAS is mainly history, naming, and the issuing body—not two separate frameworks. In practice, applying IFRS means following all effective IAS and IFRS standards plus relevant interpretations, and explaining policies and key judgments in a way that supports clarity and comparability.

Ready-to-use checklist (before close / audit):
  • Confirm your reporting basis language is consistent and accurate.
  • Update the policy library and document major judgments (keep a change log).
  • Strengthen disclosures for judgment-heavy areas (FX, tax, instruments, leases).
  • Run a quick internal “validation pass” using: Financial Statement Validation techniques.
  • For change monitoring and workflow discipline, align your close pack with: Regulatory change impacts.

© DigitalSalla Articles — General educational content. Detailed application varies by industry and reporting context.